MRSA Infections Typically Caught In Hospitals, Killing 18,000 People Each Year

Greg Webb
Attorney
(866) 735-1102 Ext 530
Posted by Greg WebbDecember 09, 2008 8:00 AM

MRSA infections kill more than 18,000 people a year, and six out of seven people infected with the antibiotic-resistant germ contract it at a health care facility. The germ, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, spreads by touch or contact, and can enter breaks in the skin as small as a mosquito bite. It can cause painful and treatable skin lesions or slip into the blood; one percent of infections are fatal, and many others result in crippling injuries.

MRSA is typically carried on the skin. Researchers have previously estimated that 1 to 2 percent of the population carries the germ, but Washington hospitals that instituted selective screening found that up to 11 percent of people carried the germ on their skin.

Last fall, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention announced the astonishing number of deaths caused by MRSA each year. In the past ten years in Washington, hospital patients infected with MRSA jumped from 141 per year to 4,723. However, the hospitals don’t track the germ or infected patients, nor do they have to reveal infection rates. The Seattle Times analyzed documents, including hospital records and death certificates, and found 672 previously unreported deaths caused by MRSA.

Screening for MRSA is quick and painless, only costing about $20, but no community hospital in Washington screens every patient for the germ. Federal veterans’ hospitals screen all patients, and have reduced their cases to almost zero. But the Washington hospitals claim that testing is unnecessary, and that washing hands and wearing protective garments is enough to prevent MRSA from spreading. However, the hospitals claiming these infection control measures are enough are failing to use them, even when state and federal inspectors are around. State records show that seven staff members at one hospital were cited for violating basic infection-control standards during a four-day inspection in 2007, even after advanced notice of the inspection. In fact, most of the state’s 25 largest hospitals have been cited for unsanitary conditions or failure to adhere to fundamental safety standards, according to state and federal regulatory reports dating back to 2005.

In Washington, there are no state or federal mandates for screening patients for MRSA. While cardiac patients, critically ill patients, and patients with weakened immune systems are among the most vulnerable to infections, there is no set screening policy among hospitals. One hospital may test intensive-care unit patients but not those having elective surgery, while another tests patients having elective surgery but not patients in its ICU. The Seattle Times found that in Washington’s 25 largest hospitals, most patients don’t get tested. Those who oppose testing all patients argue that hospitals lack the staff, resources, and space for testing or isolation of patients with MRSA. In addition, they say screening could result in lawsuits where patients picked up MRSA in the hospital after a negative screening upon admission.

The number of deaths caused by MRSA is unknown because of missing information in public health records. When filling out death certificate forms in Washington, physicians are asked to state not only the primary cause of death, but also the chain of events contributing to death. The Seattle Times found multiple instances where an autopsy or medical record showed MRSA, but the death certificate omitted it completely. In addition, an old database of death certificates released by the Washington Department of Health excluded information regarding doctors’ notes, and used an international standardized coding system with more than 13,000 diagnosis codes, none of which are for MRSA. The Seattle Times requested a complete database this year, and found 672 deaths linked to MRSA from 2003 to 2006; the old database did not link any deaths to MRSA.

Nationally, exact numbers of deaths attributed to MRSA are also unavailable, leading to the question Chuck Velte, whose mother died from MRSA, asked: “How many people die of MRSA and nobody ever knows?”

4 Comments

Have an opinion about this post? Please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader.

Jeff Goldman
Posted by Jeff Goldman
December 10, 2008 9:43 AM

One area often overlooked in the battle against the transfer of dangerous infectious diseases like MRSA in medical environments are the ubiquitous keyboards and mice. Standard keyboards and mice can not be disinfected because germs collect around and in seams and under keys. Recently Man & Machine, Inc. released a White Paper titled, “Minimizing Transmission of Infectious Disease in Heath Care Environments by Use of Disinfectable PC Keyboards and Mice.” It can be viewed at: More ...

Dr. M Sullivan
Posted by Dr. M Sullivan
December 10, 2008 2:54 PM

Read your blog regarding the MRSA superbug. The Microcyn technology has been developed that can in fact eradicate MRSA and all other antibiotic-resistant strains of bacteria. And it’s available in the US market now, but the company can't talk about its antimicrobial impact since it only has 510k FDA clearances in the U.S. But US doctors are using it and starting to talk about it.

It's something people need to know about. They don't have to live with the threat of death or amputation from MRSA and other bacteria or viruses. But it's the best-kept secret around. You can view some of the US MD stories here: More ...

Greg Webb
Posted by Greg Webb
December 10, 2008 8:31 PM

Mr. Goldman - thank you for that insight into keyboards and mice; I had never considered that and I wonder how many others have not as well. I can see how these germs would be transmitted in this manner. I suppose one of the best ways to prevent this type of transmission is to keep one's hands clean and/or disinfected, but given the large number of hospital personnel who might share a computer keyboard and mouse, not to mention all of the other contaminants from which they might contract bacteria on their hands, keeping everyone's hands sanitary would be nearly impossible. Interesting comment. I will read the link you provided. Thanks.

gre
Posted by gre
December 10, 2008 8:35 PM

Dr. Sullivan,

I was unaware of the technology for eradicating MRSA and other antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Is the FDA holding this technology up from wide-spread applications? If so, why?

Comments for this article are closed.

Subscribe to InjuryBoard Charlottesville

InjuryBoard Charlottesville RSS Feeds

Keep up with the latest updates using your favorite RSS reader

Injury Board Charlottesville is brought to you by Michie Hamlett Lowry Rasmussen and Tweel

Legal Assistance Center

More Info
Michie Hamlett Lowry Rasmussen and Tweel 866-735-1102 x 530 www.michiehamlett.com/
google
Personal Injury Lawyers Serving: Charlottesville, Roanoake, Danville, Bedford, Covington, Culpeper, Farmville, Harrisonburg, Interstate 81, Lexington, Louisa, Lynchburg, Smith Mountain Lake, Staunton, Waynesboro, Winchester
500 Court SquareSuite 300, Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 [ Show Map ]120 Day Avenue SW, Roanoke, Virginia 24016 [ Show Map ]
Better Business Bureau Accredited Business Confidential

Your question will be referred to an attorney near you. If your question is of a legal nature, then by submitting this form you agree you are not forming a formal attorney / client relationship. Read our full privacy policy.

Looking for an InjuryBoard attorney closer to home? Click here.

Subscribe to Blog Updates

Enter your email address if you would like to receive email notifications when comments are made on this post.

Email address